Automation index
How much of a Ski instructor’s job can AI already do?
A turn method comes earlier. Getting down the run without taking anyone with them do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Ski instructor
19%
AI can already do 19% of this job.
#529 / 653
View rankingSki instructor
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Level, kit and the group.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Run, the turn and the one who cuts across.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 8% | +1.8 |
Fall, the one who cries and getting them up.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Snow, the storm and closing in time.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The queue, the pass and not losing a child.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Down whole, and taking nobody with them.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 19% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- turns
- runs
- falls
- snow groups
- the pass
- the storm
- get them up
- ski levels
Sources for this job· O*NET 39-9032.00· ESCO/ISCO 3422
IS WORK OVER?
Dosimetrist
22%
#338 / 653
View rankingDosimetrist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
CT, contours and the plan.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Organ at risk, the curve and not overshooting.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Physics, the check and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Fraction, the setup and the patient who is not the same.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The oncologist, the trade-off and not signing blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
The tumour gets it, and the healthy organ does not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- dose plans
- contours
- organs at risk
- dosimetry check
- fractions
- setup
- sim CT
- DVH curves
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-2036.00· ESCO/ISCO 3211