Automation index
How much of a Social integrator’s job can AI already do?
A stock pathway comes earlier. Sitting with someone who fits nowhere until they take a step do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Social integrator
22%
AI can already do 22% of this job.
#351 / 643
View rankingSocial integrator
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Pathways, reports and case coordination.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Go along in the street, the flat and the missed appointment.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 12% | +2.2 |
Network, resources and fighting for a place.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Group, conflict and the one who walks out.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Family, social services and the note to the judge.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The bond, and the case not falling over.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- social support
- insertion pathways
- mediate conflict
- refer to services
- street work
- social reports
- coordinate cases
- group workshops
Sources for this job· O*NET 21-1093.00· ESCO/ISCO 2635
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 643
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131