Automation index
How much of a Social integrator’s job can AI already do?
A stock pathway comes earlier. Sitting with someone who fits nowhere until they take a step do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Social integrator
22%
AI can already do 22% of this job.
#344 / 633
View rankingSocial integrator
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Pathways, reports and case coordination.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Go along in the street, the flat and the missed appointment.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 12% | +2.2 |
Network, resources and fighting for a place.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Group, conflict and the one who walks out.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Family, social services and the note to the judge.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The bond, and the case not falling over.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- social support
- insertion pathways
- mediate conflict
- refer to services
- street work
- social reports
- coordinate cases
- group workshops
Sources for this job· O*NET 21-1093.00· ESCO/ISCO 2635
IS WORK OVER?
Criminologist
29%
#57 / 633
View rankingCriminologist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Data, maps and the victimisation report.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Profiles, reoffending and programme evaluation.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Field, interviews and what the spreadsheet misses.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Police, judges and the measure under debate.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Prevention, the neighbourhood and the programme that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The opinion, and not selling magic recipes.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 28% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- crime maps
- study reoffending
- victimisation
- evaluate programmes
- situational prevention
- criminological profiles
- reports for judges
- fieldwork
Sources for this job· O*NET 19-3041.00· ESCO/ISCO 2632