Automation index
How much of a Social integrator’s job can AI already do?
A stock pathway comes earlier. Sitting with someone who fits nowhere until they take a step do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Social integrator
22%
AI can already do 22% of this job.
#359 / 673
View rankingSocial integrator
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Pathways, reports and case coordination.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Go along in the street, the flat and the missed appointment.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 12% | +2.2 |
Network, resources and fighting for a place.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Group, conflict and the one who walks out.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Family, social services and the note to the judge.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The bond, and the case not falling over.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- social support
- insertion pathways
- mediate conflict
- refer to services
- street work
- social reports
- coordinate cases
- group workshops
Sources for this job· O*NET 21-1093.00· ESCO/ISCO 2635
IS WORK OVER?
Spanish language teacher
22%
#391 / 673
View rankingSpanish language teacher
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Reading, the commentary and the rubric.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Writing, the paragraph and the one who will not start.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Speaking, the fear and getting them to talk.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Spelling, the mark-up and not humiliating.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Plagiarism, the web and not looking away.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
That they write with sense, and not copying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- text commentary
- writing
- speaking
- spelling
- language rubrics
- plagiarism
- paragraphs
- reading
Sources for this job· O*NET 25-2031.00· ESCO/ISCO 2330