Automation index
How much of a Soldier’s job can AI already do?
A log and a drill plan come earlier. Carrying, obeying, and not over-firing do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Soldier
14%
AI can already do 14% of this job.
#638 / 643
View rankingSoldier
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Logs, written orders and paper logistics.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Classroom drill and simulators.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 22% | +3.1 |
Physical drill, weapons and field.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 6% | +1.3 |
Operations, watch and deployment.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 8% | +1.4 |
Unit life, discipline and comrades.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 10% | +1.6 |
Command or be commanded in a real incident.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 14% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- Logs, written orders and paper logistics
- Classroom drill and simulators
- Physical drill, weapons and field
- Operations, watch and deployment
- Unit life, discipline and comrades
- Command or be commanded in a real incident
- militar
- soldado
- soldier
- ejercito
Sources for this job· O*NET 55-1011.00· ESCO/ISCO 0110
IS WORK OVER?
Epidemiologist
31%
#34 / 643
View rankingEpidemiologist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Surveillance, rates and the outbreak on the map.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Studies, bias and the report for public health.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 48% | +7.7 |
Surveys, contacts and the case interview.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Committee, the unpopular measure and the press.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Field, the care-home outbreak and dirty data.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Judgement, uncertainty and signing the alert.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 31% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- watch outbreaks
- compute rates
- epi studies
- case interviews
- map epidemics
- public-health measures
- contact tracing
- health alerts
Sources for this job· O*NET 19-1041.00· ESCO/ISCO 2263