Automation index
How much of a Sonographer’s job can AI already do?
A slice protocol comes earlier. Finding the fetus and not saying too much do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Sonographer
20%
AI can already do 20% of this job.
#484 / 653
View rankingSonographer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocols, IDs and worklists.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Scan, measure and capture slices.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 12% | +2.6 |
Calm, explain and not jump a diagnosis.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Brief the radiologist and archive the study.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Probes, gel and kit maintenance.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 16% | +2.6 |
Pregnancy, bad news and shoulder ergonomics.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 14% | +2 |
| Total | 100% | 20% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- Protocols, IDs and worklists
- Scan, measure and capture slices
- Calm, explain and not jump a diagnosis
- Probes, gel and kit maintenance
- tecnico en ecografia
- ecografista
- sonographer
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-2032.00· ESCO/ISCO 3211
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 653
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131