Automation index
How much of a Spa manager’s job can AI already do?
A cabin diary comes earlier. The house smelling right without double-booking the massage do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Spa manager
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#148 / 643
View rankingSpa manager
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Diary, cabins and the staff.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Client, the complaint and the one who is late.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Protocols, hygiene and the product.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Occupancy, the hotel and not giving the circuit away.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The inspection, insurance and not hiding the incident.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Smell right, and no double-booked massage.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- cabin diary
- hygiene protocols
- the circuit
- spa occupancy
- spa staff
- products
- complaints
- massages
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9072.00· ESCO/ISCO 1431
IS WORK OVER?
Dosimetrist
22%
#336 / 643
View rankingDosimetrist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
CT, contours and the plan.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Organ at risk, the curve and not overshooting.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Physics, the check and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Fraction, the setup and the patient who is not the same.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The oncologist, the trade-off and not signing blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
The tumour gets it, and the healthy organ does not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- dose plans
- contours
- organs at risk
- dosimetry check
- fractions
- setup
- sim CT
- DVH curves
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-2036.00· ESCO/ISCO 3211