Automation index
How much of a Special-education teacher’s job can AI already do?
An IEP comes earlier. Adapting so they are really in the group do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Special-education teacher
22%
AI can already do 22% of this job.
#356 / 643
View rankingSpecial-education teacher
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
IEP, aims and coordination.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Classroom, support and the one who overflows.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Family, the report and not selling miracles.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Yard, inclusion and the one left alone.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Staff, resources and fighting for the place.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Really in the group, not on paper.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- IEP
- classroom support
- family reports
- inclusion
- the yard
- resources
- places
- overflow
Sources for this job· O*NET 25-2051.00· ESCO/ISCO 2352
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 643
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131