Automation index
How much of a Special-education teacher’s job can AI already do?
An IEP comes earlier. Adapting so they are really in the group do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Special-education teacher
22%
AI can already do 22% of this job.
#385 / 703
View rankingSpecial-education teacher
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
IEP, aims and coordination.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Classroom, support and the one who overflows.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Family, the report and not selling miracles.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Yard, inclusion and the one left alone.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Staff, resources and fighting for the place.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Really in the group, not on paper.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- IEP
- classroom support
- family reports
- inclusion
- the yard
- resources
- places
- overflow
Sources for this job· O*NET 25-2051.00· ESCO/ISCO 2352
IS WORK OVER?
Instructional designer
27%
#158 / 703
View rankingInstructional designer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Aim, the storyboard and the module.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Pilot, the learner and what is not understood.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Activity, the feedback and not putting a silly test.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
LMS, the figure and not inflating completion.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The client, the deadline and not cutting the practice.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That they learn, and not leaving the empty video.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- course storyboard
- modules
- learner pilot
- activities
- LMS
- completion
- feedback
- not a silly test
Sources for this job· O*NET 25-9031.00· ESCO/ISCO 2351