Automation index
How much of a Special-education teacher’s job can AI already do?
An IEP comes earlier. Adapting so they are really in the group do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Special-education teacher
22%
AI can already do 22% of this job.
#349 / 633
View rankingSpecial-education teacher
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
IEP, aims and coordination.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Classroom, support and the one who overflows.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Family, the report and not selling miracles.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Yard, inclusion and the one left alone.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Staff, resources and fighting for the place.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Really in the group, not on paper.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- IEP
- classroom support
- family reports
- inclusion
- the yard
- resources
- places
- overflow
Sources for this job· O*NET 25-2051.00· ESCO/ISCO 2352
IS WORK OVER?
Job insertion technician
24%
#282 / 633
View rankingJob insertion technician
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Employer prospecting and the agreements.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Go with them to the job and the first day.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Follow-up, incidents and the one who quits.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Reports, indicators and justifying the grant.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The hard candidate and the employer who pulls out.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That they stay, and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 24% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- prospect employers
- place candidates
- follow up in post
- insertion agreements
- justify grants
- job accompaniment
- workplace incidents
- insertion indicators
Sources for this job· O*NET 21-1093.00· ESCO/ISCO 2423