Automation index
How much of a Special-education teacher’s job can AI already do?
An IEP comes earlier. Adapting so they are really in the group do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Special-education teacher
22%
AI can already do 22% of this job.
#364 / 673
View rankingSpecial-education teacher
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
IEP, aims and coordination.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Classroom, support and the one who overflows.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Family, the report and not selling miracles.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Yard, inclusion and the one left alone.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Staff, resources and fighting for the place.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Really in the group, not on paper.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- IEP
- classroom support
- family reports
- inclusion
- the yard
- resources
- places
- overflow
Sources for this job· O*NET 25-2051.00· ESCO/ISCO 2352
IS WORK OVER?
Spanish language teacher
22%
#391 / 673
View rankingSpanish language teacher
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Reading, the commentary and the rubric.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Writing, the paragraph and the one who will not start.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Speaking, the fear and getting them to talk.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Spelling, the mark-up and not humiliating.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Plagiarism, the web and not looking away.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
That they write with sense, and not copying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- text commentary
- writing
- speaking
- spelling
- language rubrics
- plagiarism
- paragraphs
- reading
Sources for this job· O*NET 25-2031.00· ESCO/ISCO 2330