Automation index
How much of a Special-education teacher’s job can AI already do?
An IEP comes earlier. Adapting so they are really in the group do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Special-education teacher
22%
AI can already do 22% of this job.
#349 / 633
View rankingSpecial-education teacher
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
IEP, aims and coordination.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Classroom, support and the one who overflows.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Family, the report and not selling miracles.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Yard, inclusion and the one left alone.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Staff, resources and fighting for the place.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Really in the group, not on paper.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- IEP
- classroom support
- family reports
- inclusion
- the yard
- resources
- places
- overflow
Sources for this job· O*NET 25-2051.00· ESCO/ISCO 2352
IS WORK OVER?
Sporting director
27%
#149 / 633
View rankingSporting director
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Squad, wages and financial fair play.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Signings, scouting and the one who does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Coach, the project and the one who burns.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Board, the fans and not selling smoke.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The injury, the window and not papering over.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Sign well, and not breaking the dressing room.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- squad
- signings
- fair play
- scouting
- wages
- the project
- dressing room
- the window
Sources for this job· O*NET 27-2022.00· ESCO/ISCO 3422