Automation index
How much of a Sporting director’s job can AI already do?
A squad map comes earlier. Signing without breaking the dressing room do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Sporting director
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#149 / 643
View rankingSporting director
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Squad, wages and financial fair play.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Signings, scouting and the one who does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Coach, the project and the one who burns.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Board, the fans and not selling smoke.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The injury, the window and not papering over.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Sign well, and not breaking the dressing room.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- squad
- signings
- fair play
- scouting
- wages
- the project
- dressing room
- the window
Sources for this job· O*NET 27-2022.00· ESCO/ISCO 3422
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 643
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131