Automation index
How much of a Sporting director’s job can AI already do?
A squad map comes earlier. Signing without breaking the dressing room do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Sporting director
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#149 / 623
View rankingSporting director
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Squad, wages and financial fair play.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Signings, scouting and the one who does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Coach, the project and the one who burns.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Board, the fans and not selling smoke.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The injury, the window and not papering over.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Sign well, and not breaking the dressing room.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- squad
- signings
- fair play
- scouting
- wages
- the project
- dressing room
- the window
Sources for this job· O*NET 27-2022.00· ESCO/ISCO 3422
IS WORK OVER?
Judicial secretary
24%
#279 / 623
View rankingJudicial secretary
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Minutes, decrees and the court’s public faith.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 44% | +7 |
Hearing, recording the act and the incident.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Case drive, reviews and the court.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Attachments, auctions and enforcement.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The judge, the parties and the competence clash.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Faith in the act, and not leaving a procedural hole.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 24% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- attest in court
- decrees
- record hearings
- attachments
- auctions
- review appeals
- drive enforcement
- public faith
Sources for this job· O*NET 23-2093.00· ESCO/ISCO 3411