Automation index
How much of a Sports physician’s job can AI already do?
A cardiopulmonary test comes earlier. Clearing the return to play and not losing the season do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Sports physician
23%
AI can already do 23% of this job.
#310 / 643
View rankingSports physician
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
CPET, labs and load.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 48% | +7.7 |
Injury, exam and the yes or no to training.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Rehab, injections and the club note.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Anti-doping, certificates and the yearly check.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The bench, the match and the twisted ankle.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Club pressure and signing return to play.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 23% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CPET
- rehab injuries
- return to play
- inject athletes
- anti-doping
- fitness certificate
- training load
- sports medicine
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-1229.00· ESCO/ISCO 2212
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 643
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131