Automation index
How much of a Sports physician’s job can AI already do?
A cardiopulmonary test comes earlier. Clearing the return to play and not losing the season do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Sports physician
23%
AI can already do 23% of this job.
#339 / 733
View rankingSports physician
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
CPET, labs and load.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 48% | +7.7 |
Injury, exam and the yes or no to training.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Rehab, injections and the club note.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Anti-doping, certificates and the yearly check.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The bench, the match and the twisted ankle.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Club pressure and signing return to play.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 23% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CPET
- rehab injuries
- return to play
- inject athletes
- anti-doping
- fitness certificate
- training load
- sports medicine
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-1229.00· ESCO/ISCO 2212
IS WORK OVER?
Reliability engineer
27%
#175 / 733
View rankingReliability engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Data, MTBF and the Pareto.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Failure, the cause and not patching twice.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Spare, the critical and not hiding it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
RCM, the plan and the one that is not done.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Production, the rush and not running the tired one.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it does not drop at three, and not hiding the spare.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- MTBF
- Pareto
- root causes
- critical spares
- RCM
- failures
- maintenance plans
- not patch twice
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2112.00· ESCO/ISCO 2141