Automation index
How much of a Sports physician’s job can AI already do?
A cardiopulmonary test comes earlier. Clearing the return to play and not losing the season do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Sports physician
23%
AI can already do 23% of this job.
#315 / 673
View rankingSports physician
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
CPET, labs and load.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 48% | +7.7 |
Injury, exam and the yes or no to training.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Rehab, injections and the club note.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Anti-doping, certificates and the yearly check.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The bench, the match and the twisted ankle.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Club pressure and signing return to play.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 23% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CPET
- rehab injuries
- return to play
- inject athletes
- anti-doping
- fitness certificate
- training load
- sports medicine
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-1229.00· ESCO/ISCO 2212
IS WORK OVER?
Spanish language teacher
22%
#391 / 673
View rankingSpanish language teacher
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Reading, the commentary and the rubric.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Writing, the paragraph and the one who will not start.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Speaking, the fear and getting them to talk.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Spelling, the mark-up and not humiliating.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Plagiarism, the web and not looking away.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
That they write with sense, and not copying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- text commentary
- writing
- speaking
- spelling
- language rubrics
- plagiarism
- paragraphs
- reading
Sources for this job· O*NET 25-2031.00· ESCO/ISCO 2330