Automation index
How much of a Sports physiotherapist’s job can AI already do?
A return-to-play protocol comes earlier. Calling Sunday and not burning the player do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Sports physiotherapist
22%
AI can already do 22% of this job.
#378 / 743
View rankingSports physiotherapist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Injury, the test and the note.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Pitch, the move and the one who lies about pain.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Gym, the load and not rushing.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Sunday, the coach and not yielding.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The press, the rumour and not leaking.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
If they play Sunday, sign it. And not burning them.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- return to play
- injury notes
- gym load
- sport-specific move
- Sunday clearance
- the coach
- not yield
- not leak
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-1123.00· ESCO/ISCO 2264
IS WORK OVER?
Reliability engineer
27%
#176 / 743
View rankingReliability engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Data, MTBF and the Pareto.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Failure, the cause and not patching twice.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Spare, the critical and not hiding it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
RCM, the plan and the one that is not done.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Production, the rush and not running the tired one.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it does not drop at three, and not hiding the spare.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- MTBF
- Pareto
- root causes
- critical spares
- RCM
- failures
- maintenance plans
- not patch twice
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2112.00· ESCO/ISCO 2141