Automation index
How much of a Stage manager’s job can AI already do?
A prompt book comes earlier. Calling the cue so the show goes up do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Stage manager
22%
AI can already do 22% of this job.
#388 / 653
View rankingStage manager
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Book, cues and the day’s plan.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Show, the delay and the one who is not there.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Rehearsals, changes and updating the book.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Crews, the clash and not missing the cue.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Opening, nerves and not bringing the curtain early.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
That the show goes up, and the cue on time.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- prompt book
- cues
- show plan
- rehearsals
- crews
- opening night
- curtain
- rehearsal changes
Sources for this job· O*NET 27-2012.00· ESCO/ISCO 3435
IS WORK OVER?
Dosimetrist
22%
#338 / 653
View rankingDosimetrist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
CT, contours and the plan.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Organ at risk, the curve and not overshooting.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Physics, the check and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Fraction, the setup and the patient who is not the same.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The oncologist, the trade-off and not signing blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
The tumour gets it, and the healthy organ does not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- dose plans
- contours
- organs at risk
- dosimetry check
- fractions
- setup
- sim CT
- DVH curves
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-2036.00· ESCO/ISCO 3211