Automation index
How much of a Stage manager’s job can AI already do?
A prompt book comes earlier. Calling the cue so the show goes up do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Stage manager
22%
AI can already do 22% of this job.
#375 / 633
View rankingStage manager
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Book, cues and the day’s plan.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Show, the delay and the one who is not there.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Rehearsals, changes and updating the book.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Crews, the clash and not missing the cue.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Opening, nerves and not bringing the curtain early.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
That the show goes up, and the cue on time.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- prompt book
- cues
- show plan
- rehearsals
- crews
- opening night
- curtain
- rehearsal changes
Sources for this job· O*NET 27-2012.00· ESCO/ISCO 3435
IS WORK OVER?
Structural engineer
26%
#204 / 633
View rankingStructural engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Model, combinations and the calculation annex.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Site, rebar and what was not poured that way.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Code, building regs and the sizing note.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Pathology, the crack and shore or not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
The architect, the deadline and not trimming the depth.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Sign that it stands, and not hiding the assumption.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 26% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- calculate structures
- frame model
- calculation annex
- building regs
- rebar
- structural pathology
- load combinations
- shore
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2051.00· ESCO/ISCO 2142