Automation index
How much of a Stagehand’s job can AI already do?
A move plot comes earlier. Changing the set in the black without taking anyone down do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Stagehand
19%
AI can already do 19% of this job.
#565 / 653
View rankingStagehand
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Plot, marks and the weight.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Change, blackout and the one who is late.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 8% | +1.8 |
Loads, pulleys and the one that slips.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Technical rehearsal and the one who walks the light.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The show, the surprise and not improvising loads.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Take nobody down, and the change on time.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 19% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- blackout changes
- stage marks
- pulleys
- loads
- technical rehearsal
- sets
- the show
- weights
Sources for this job· O*NET 27-2099.00· ESCO/ISCO 3435
IS WORK OVER?
Dosimetrist
22%
#338 / 653
View rankingDosimetrist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
CT, contours and the plan.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Organ at risk, the curve and not overshooting.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Physics, the check and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Fraction, the setup and the patient who is not the same.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The oncologist, the trade-off and not signing blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
The tumour gets it, and the healthy organ does not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- dose plans
- contours
- organs at risk
- dosimetry check
- fractions
- setup
- sim CT
- DVH curves
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-2036.00· ESCO/ISCO 3211