Automation index
How much of a Stagehand’s job can AI already do?
A move plot comes earlier. Changing the set in the black without taking anyone down do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Stagehand
19%
AI can already do 19% of this job.
#654 / 743
View rankingStagehand
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Plot, marks and the weight.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Change, blackout and the one who is late.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 8% | +1.8 |
Loads, pulleys and the one that slips.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Technical rehearsal and the one who walks the light.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The show, the surprise and not improvising loads.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Take nobody down, and the change on time.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 19% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- blackout changes
- stage marks
- pulleys
- loads
- technical rehearsal
- sets
- the show
- weights
Sources for this job· O*NET 27-2099.00· ESCO/ISCO 3435
IS WORK OVER?
Reliability engineer
27%
#176 / 743
View rankingReliability engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Data, MTBF and the Pareto.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Failure, the cause and not patching twice.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Spare, the critical and not hiding it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
RCM, the plan and the one that is not done.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Production, the rush and not running the tired one.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it does not drop at three, and not hiding the spare.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- MTBF
- Pareto
- root causes
- critical spares
- RCM
- failures
- maintenance plans
- not patch twice
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2112.00· ESCO/ISCO 2141