Automation index
How much of a Stained-glass artist’s job can AI already do?
A window cartoon comes earlier. Leading, soldering without letting the air in do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Stained-glass artist
19%
AI can already do 19% of this job.
#548 / 633
View rankingStained-glass artist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Cartoon, cut and the glass colour.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Lead, solder and the one that opens.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 8% | +1.8 |
Cement, clean and the weatherseal.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Opening, the church and the scaffold.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The restoration, the original and not inventing extra.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
No air in, and firm lead.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 19% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- window cartoon
- lead
- solder
- cement
- cut glass
- openings
- restore windows
- weatherseal
Sources for this job· O*NET 51-9195.00· ESCO/ISCO 7315
IS WORK OVER?
Cartographer
31%
#31 / 633
View rankingCartographer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Sources, OSM, satellite and generalisation.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Symbology, type and visual hierarchy.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 48% | +7.7 |
Projections, scales and getting the heights right.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Review with the client, the field and the lie in the data.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Print maps, web maps and updates.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Credit, metadata and owning the map.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 31% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- make maps
- generalise cartography
- symbology
- choose projection
- visual hierarchy
- update OSM
- web maps
- maps that do not lie
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-1021.00· ESCO/ISCO 2165