Automation index
How much of a Stained-glass artist’s job can AI already do?
A window cartoon comes earlier. Leading, soldering without letting the air in do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Stained-glass artist
19%
AI can already do 19% of this job.
#657 / 743
View rankingStained-glass artist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Cartoon, cut and the glass colour.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Lead, solder and the one that opens.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 8% | +1.8 |
Cement, clean and the weatherseal.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Opening, the church and the scaffold.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The restoration, the original and not inventing extra.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
No air in, and firm lead.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 19% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- window cartoon
- lead
- solder
- cement
- cut glass
- openings
- restore windows
- weatherseal
Sources for this job· O*NET 51-9195.00· ESCO/ISCO 7315
IS WORK OVER?
Reliability engineer
27%
#176 / 743
View rankingReliability engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Data, MTBF and the Pareto.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Failure, the cause and not patching twice.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Spare, the critical and not hiding it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
RCM, the plan and the one that is not done.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Production, the rush and not running the tired one.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it does not drop at three, and not hiding the spare.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- MTBF
- Pareto
- root causes
- critical spares
- RCM
- failures
- maintenance plans
- not patch twice
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2112.00· ESCO/ISCO 2141