Automation index
How much of a Station master’s job can AI already do?
A train graph comes earlier. Leaving on time without meeting on the same line do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Station master
23%
AI can already do 23% of this job.
#302 / 633
View rankingStation master
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Graph, orders and the station log.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Platforms, the crossing and the late train.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Staff, shifts and the ticket-office gap.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Incident, passengers and the PA.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Works, closures and leaving nobody on the platform.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
That they do not meet, and signing the graph.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 23% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- train graph
- orders
- platforms
- ticket office
- PA
- line crossings
- station shifts
- station logs
Sources for this job· O*NET 53-4031.00· ESCO/ISCO 4323
IS WORK OVER?
BIM modeller
28%
#109 / 633
View rankingBIM modeller
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Model, families and clash detection.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
IFC, BEP and trade coordination.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Site, the one who will not open the model, and the meeting.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Quantities, parameters and the 4D nobody uses.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The last-minute change and not breaking the federated model.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it can be built, and not over-modelling.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 28% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- BIM modelling
- clash detection
- Revit families
- IFC
- BEP
- coordinate trades
- BIM quantities
- federated model
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-3011.00· ESCO/ISCO 3118