Automation index
How much of a Station master’s job can AI already do?
A train graph comes earlier. Leaving on time without meeting on the same line do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Station master
23%
AI can already do 23% of this job.
#302 / 633
View rankingStation master
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Graph, orders and the station log.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Platforms, the crossing and the late train.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Staff, shifts and the ticket-office gap.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Incident, passengers and the PA.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Works, closures and leaving nobody on the platform.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
That they do not meet, and signing the graph.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 23% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- train graph
- orders
- platforms
- ticket office
- PA
- line crossings
- station shifts
- station logs
Sources for this job· O*NET 53-4031.00· ESCO/ISCO 4323
IS WORK OVER?
Materials engineer
27%
#162 / 633
View rankingMaterials engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Tests, metallography and the spec.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Shop, heat treatment and the part that fails spec.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Material choice, corrosion and fatigue.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Supplier, certificates and the doubtful batch.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The field failure and the root cause.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it does not fail, and not swapping the material blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- materials tests
- metallography
- choose alloys
- corrosion
- fatigue
- heat treatment
- failure analysis
- batch certificates
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2131.00· ESCO/ISCO 2149