Automation index
How much of a Stockbroker’s job can AI already do?
An order and a note come earlier. Calling someone when the market is sinking does not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Stockbroker
25%
AI can already do 25% of this job.
#224 / 643
View rankingStockbroker
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Orders, notes and portfolio screens.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Analysis, theses and market notes.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Call, persuade and not over-push.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Compliance, KYC and recordings.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Desk, hours and execution issues.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 16% | +2.6 |
Not putting a client into something they do not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 25% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- Orders, notes and portfolio screens
- Analysis, theses and market notes
- Call, persuade and not over-push
- Compliance, KYC and recordings
- Desk, hours and execution issues
- corredor de bolsa
- broker
- agente de bolsa
Sources for this job· O*NET 41-3031.00· ESCO/ISCO 3311
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 643
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131