Automation index
How much of a Stonemason’s job can AI already do?
A template and a cut come earlier. Fitting a worktop without a lip does not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Stonemason
18%
AI can already do 18% of this job.
#591 / 653
View rankingStonemason
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Templates, cutting lists and stone orders.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Cut, polish and edge.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 10% | +2.2 |
Set, level and seal on site.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
Client, kitchen and bath.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Shop, resins and repairs.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Not delivering a piece that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 14% | +2 |
| Total | 100% | 18% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- build walls
- plaster
- site work
- Templates, cutting lists and stone orders
- Cut, polish and edge
- Set, level and seal on site
- Client, kitchen and bath
- Shop, resins and repairs
- Not delivering a piece that does not fit
- marmolista
Sources for this job· O*NET 47-2022.00· ESCO/ISCO 7113
IS WORK OVER?
Dosimetrist
22%
#338 / 653
View rankingDosimetrist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
CT, contours and the plan.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Organ at risk, the curve and not overshooting.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Physics, the check and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Fraction, the setup and the patient who is not the same.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The oncologist, the trade-off and not signing blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
The tumour gets it, and the healthy organ does not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- dose plans
- contours
- organs at risk
- dosimetry check
- fractions
- setup
- sim CT
- DVH curves
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-2036.00· ESCO/ISCO 3211