Automation index
How much of a Strength and conditioning coach’s job can AI already do?
A load GPS comes earlier. Getting them ready without breaking them in the gym do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Strength and conditioning coach
22%
AI can already do 22% of this job.
#377 / 653
View rankingStrength and conditioning coach
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Load, GPS and the microcycle.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Gym, the pattern and the one who cheats.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Rehab, the injured and not rushing the return.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Report, the manager and the fight over minutes.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The peak, pre-season and not grinding them.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Ready, and not broken.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- load
- training GPS
- microcycles
- rehab
- movement pattern
- pre-season
- reports to the manager
- the gym
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-9091.00· ESCO/ISCO 3423
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 653
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131