Automation index
How much of a Strength and conditioning coach’s job can AI already do?
A load GPS comes earlier. Getting them ready without breaking them in the gym do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Strength and conditioning coach
22%
AI can already do 22% of this job.
#365 / 633
View rankingStrength and conditioning coach
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Load, GPS and the microcycle.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Gym, the pattern and the one who cheats.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Rehab, the injured and not rushing the return.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Report, the manager and the fight over minutes.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The peak, pre-season and not grinding them.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Ready, and not broken.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- load
- training GPS
- microcycles
- rehab
- movement pattern
- pre-season
- reports to the manager
- the gym
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-9091.00· ESCO/ISCO 3423
IS WORK OVER?
Hydraulic engineer
27%
#164 / 633
View rankingHydraulic engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Hydrology, flows and the floodplain model.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Field, section and what LiDAR misses.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Drainage works, pumps and the outfall.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Water permits and the river authority.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The flood, the village and the yes to the channel.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it does not flood, and not trusting the model alone.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- model floodplains
- flows
- drainage
- channel works
- water permits
- pumps
- channel sections
- river authority
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2051.00· ESCO/ISCO 2142