Automation index
How much of a Strength and conditioning coach’s job can AI already do?
A load GPS comes earlier. Getting them ready without breaking them in the gym do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Strength and conditioning coach
22%
AI can already do 22% of this job.
#432 / 743
View rankingStrength and conditioning coach
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Load, GPS and the microcycle.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Gym, the pattern and the one who cheats.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Rehab, the injured and not rushing the return.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Report, the manager and the fight over minutes.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The peak, pre-season and not grinding them.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Ready, and not broken.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- load
- training GPS
- microcycles
- rehab
- movement pattern
- pre-season
- reports to the manager
- the gym
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-9091.00· ESCO/ISCO 3423
IS WORK OVER?
Reliability engineer
27%
#176 / 743
View rankingReliability engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Data, MTBF and the Pareto.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Failure, the cause and not patching twice.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Spare, the critical and not hiding it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
RCM, the plan and the one that is not done.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Production, the rush and not running the tired one.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it does not drop at three, and not hiding the spare.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- MTBF
- Pareto
- root causes
- critical spares
- RCM
- failures
- maintenance plans
- not patch twice
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2112.00· ESCO/ISCO 2141