Automation index
How much of a Stucco artist’s job can AI already do?
A cornice mould comes earlier. Laying stucco without it cracking do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Stucco artist
19%
AI can already do 19% of this job.
#513 / 653
View rankingStucco artist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Mould, mix and the set-out.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Lay, comb and the one that sags.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 8% | +1.8 |
Moulding, the junction and the corner.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Drying, crack and the touch-up.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The high ceiling, the scaffold and not loading extra.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
No crack, and a clean junction.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 19% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- stucco
- cornices
- mouldings
- comb
- junctions
- cracks
- scaffold
- ceiling set-out
Sources for this job· O*NET 47-2161.00· ESCO/ISCO 7123
IS WORK OVER?
Dosimetrist
22%
#338 / 653
View rankingDosimetrist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
CT, contours and the plan.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Organ at risk, the curve and not overshooting.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Physics, the check and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Fraction, the setup and the patient who is not the same.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The oncologist, the trade-off and not signing blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
The tumour gets it, and the healthy organ does not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- dose plans
- contours
- organs at risk
- dosimetry check
- fractions
- setup
- sim CT
- DVH curves
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-2036.00· ESCO/ISCO 3211