Automation index
How much of a Stucco artist’s job can AI already do?
A cornice mould comes earlier. Laying stucco without it cracking do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Stucco artist
19%
AI can already do 19% of this job.
#506 / 643
View rankingStucco artist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Mould, mix and the set-out.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Lay, comb and the one that sags.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 8% | +1.8 |
Moulding, the junction and the corner.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Drying, crack and the touch-up.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The high ceiling, the scaffold and not loading extra.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
No crack, and a clean junction.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 19% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- stucco
- cornices
- mouldings
- comb
- junctions
- cracks
- scaffold
- ceiling set-out
Sources for this job· O*NET 47-2161.00· ESCO/ISCO 7123
IS WORK OVER?
Hydraulic engineer
27%
#166 / 643
View rankingHydraulic engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Hydrology, flows and the floodplain model.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Field, section and what LiDAR misses.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Drainage works, pumps and the outfall.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Water permits and the river authority.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The flood, the village and the yes to the channel.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it does not flood, and not trusting the model alone.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- model floodplains
- flows
- drainage
- channel works
- water permits
- pumps
- channel sections
- river authority
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2051.00· ESCO/ISCO 2142