Automation index
How much of a Stucco artist’s job can AI already do?
A cornice mould comes earlier. Laying stucco without it cracking do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Stucco artist
19%
AI can already do 19% of this job.
#591 / 743
View rankingStucco artist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Mould, mix and the set-out.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Lay, comb and the one that sags.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 8% | +1.8 |
Moulding, the junction and the corner.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Drying, crack and the touch-up.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The high ceiling, the scaffold and not loading extra.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
No crack, and a clean junction.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 19% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- stucco
- cornices
- mouldings
- comb
- junctions
- cracks
- scaffold
- ceiling set-out
Sources for this job· O*NET 47-2161.00· ESCO/ISCO 7123
IS WORK OVER?
Reliability engineer
27%
#176 / 743
View rankingReliability engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Data, MTBF and the Pareto.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Failure, the cause and not patching twice.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Spare, the critical and not hiding it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
RCM, the plan and the one that is not done.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Production, the rush and not running the tired one.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it does not drop at three, and not hiding the spare.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- MTBF
- Pareto
- root causes
- critical spares
- RCM
- failures
- maintenance plans
- not patch twice
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2112.00· ESCO/ISCO 2141