Automation index
How much of a Table official’s job can AI already do?
A scoresheet comes earlier. Clock, fouls and not wrecking the result do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Table official
22%
AI can already do 22% of this job.
#359 / 663
View rankingTable official
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Sheet, clock and the protocol.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Fouls, the warning and the one who argues.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Timeout, the scoreboard and not jumping it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The referee, the table and not contradicting.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The crowd, the shove and keeping calm.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
A clean result, and the sheet signed.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- scoresheets
- clock
- fouls
- timeouts
- scoreboard
- the table
- protocol
- warnings
Sources for this job· O*NET 27-2023.00· ESCO/ISCO 3422
IS WORK OVER?
Public health officer
22%
#413 / 663
View rankingPublic health officer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Surveillance, the indicator and the alert.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Outbreak, the questionnaire and the one who will not answer.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Field, the source and shutting the premises.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Report, the mayor and not softening the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Vaccination, coverage and the rumour.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Cut the outbreak, and not softening it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- epi surveillance
- outbreaks
- field questionnaires
- shut premises
- vaccine coverage
- public-health alerts
- mayors
- not soften figures
Sources for this job· O*NET 21-1091.00· ESCO/ISCO 2263