Automation index
How much of a Tactical analyst’s job can AI already do?
A clip comes earlier. The manager using it, and it not being noise, do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Tactical analyst
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#132 / 643
View rankingTactical analyst
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Video, tags and the report.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Opponent, patterns and the one who hides.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Preview, the dressing room and not drowning them.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Live, the tablet and the change.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The manager, the ego and not contradicting in public.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it is used, and not being noise.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- tag video
- opponent patterns
- preview
- bench tablet
- tactical reports
- dressing room
- changes
- data noise
Sources for this job· O*NET 27-2022.00· ESCO/ISCO 3422
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 643
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131