Automation index
How much of a Tactical analyst’s job can AI already do?
A clip comes earlier. The manager using it, and it not being noise, do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Tactical analyst
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#132 / 643
View rankingTactical analyst
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Video, tags and the report.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Opponent, patterns and the one who hides.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Preview, the dressing room and not drowning them.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Live, the tablet and the change.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The manager, the ego and not contradicting in public.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it is used, and not being noise.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- tag video
- opponent patterns
- preview
- bench tablet
- tactical reports
- dressing room
- changes
- data noise
Sources for this job· O*NET 27-2022.00· ESCO/ISCO 3422
IS WORK OVER?
Dosimetrist
22%
#336 / 643
View rankingDosimetrist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
CT, contours and the plan.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Organ at risk, the curve and not overshooting.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Physics, the check and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Fraction, the setup and the patient who is not the same.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The oncologist, the trade-off and not signing blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
The tumour gets it, and the healthy organ does not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- dose plans
- contours
- organs at risk
- dosimetry check
- fractions
- setup
- sim CT
- DVH curves
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-2036.00· ESCO/ISCO 3211