Automation index
How much of a Tactical analyst’s job can AI already do?
A clip comes earlier. The manager using it, and it not being noise, do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Tactical analyst
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#132 / 623
View rankingTactical analyst
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Video, tags and the report.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Opponent, patterns and the one who hides.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Preview, the dressing room and not drowning them.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Live, the tablet and the change.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The manager, the ego and not contradicting in public.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it is used, and not being noise.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- tag video
- opponent patterns
- preview
- bench tablet
- tactical reports
- dressing room
- changes
- data noise
Sources for this job· O*NET 27-2022.00· ESCO/ISCO 3422
IS WORK OVER?
Hydraulic engineer
27%
#164 / 623
View rankingHydraulic engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Hydrology, flows and the floodplain model.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Field, section and what LiDAR misses.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Drainage works, pumps and the outfall.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Water permits and the river authority.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The flood, the village and the yes to the channel.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it does not flood, and not trusting the model alone.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- model floodplains
- flows
- drainage
- channel works
- water permits
- pumps
- channel sections
- river authority
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2051.00· ESCO/ISCO 2142