Automation index
How much of a Tailor’s job can AI already do?
A pattern comes earlier. Fitting, marking and hanging on the body do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Tailor
19%
AI can already do 19% of this job.
#542 / 643
View rankingTailor
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Pattern, measures and the fitting.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Cut, tack and the shoulder that will not hang.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 8% | +1.8 |
Fit, mark and the client who loses weight.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Buttonholes, lining and the hand finish.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The groom, the deadline and not rushing the hem.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Hang on the body, and not leaving a high shoulder.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 19% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- take measures
- patterns
- tack
- buttonholes
- tailor fittings
- linings
- hem
- shoulder
Sources for this job· O*NET 51-6052.00· ESCO/ISCO 7531
IS WORK OVER?
Cartographer
31%
#31 / 643
View rankingCartographer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Sources, OSM, satellite and generalisation.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Symbology, type and visual hierarchy.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 48% | +7.7 |
Projections, scales and getting the heights right.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Review with the client, the field and the lie in the data.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Print maps, web maps and updates.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Credit, metadata and owning the map.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 31% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- make maps
- generalise cartography
- symbology
- choose projection
- visual hierarchy
- update OSM
- web maps
- maps that do not lie
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-1021.00· ESCO/ISCO 2165