Automation index
How much of a Tax inspector’s job can AI already do?
A data match comes earlier. Sitting across from the taxpayer and signing the adjustment do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Tax inspector
28%
AI can already do 28% of this job.
#104 / 643
View rankingTax inspector
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Data matching, returns and sampling.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Requests, minutes and the proposal.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
The visit, the second till and what is not in the sheet.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Objections, appeals and the tax tribunal.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The team, deadlines and the file that slips.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
A fair adjustment and signing the minute.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 28% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- match tax data
- raise assessments
- request papers
- visit taxpayers
- adjust tax
- objections
- tax tribunal
- tax inspection
Sources for this job· O*NET 13-2081.00· ESCO/ISCO 3352
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 643
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131