Automation index
How much of a Tax inspector’s job can AI already do?
A data match comes earlier. Sitting across from the taxpayer and signing the adjustment do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Tax inspector
28%
AI can already do 28% of this job.
#104 / 623
View rankingTax inspector
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Data matching, returns and sampling.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Requests, minutes and the proposal.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
The visit, the second till and what is not in the sheet.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Objections, appeals and the tax tribunal.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The team, deadlines and the file that slips.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
A fair adjustment and signing the minute.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 28% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- match tax data
- raise assessments
- request papers
- visit taxpayers
- adjust tax
- objections
- tax tribunal
- tax inspection
Sources for this job· O*NET 13-2081.00· ESCO/ISCO 3352
IS WORK OVER?
Epidemiologist
31%
#34 / 623
View rankingEpidemiologist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Surveillance, rates and the outbreak on the map.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Studies, bias and the report for public health.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 48% | +7.7 |
Surveys, contacts and the case interview.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Committee, the unpopular measure and the press.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Field, the care-home outbreak and dirty data.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Judgement, uncertainty and signing the alert.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 31% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- watch outbreaks
- compute rates
- epi studies
- case interviews
- map epidemics
- public-health measures
- contact tracing
- health alerts
Sources for this job· O*NET 19-1041.00· ESCO/ISCO 2263