Automation index
How much of a Tax inspector’s job can AI already do?
A data match comes earlier. Sitting across from the taxpayer and signing the adjustment do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Tax inspector
28%
AI can already do 28% of this job.
#104 / 743
View rankingTax inspector
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Data matching, returns and sampling.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Requests, minutes and the proposal.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
The visit, the second till and what is not in the sheet.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Objections, appeals and the tax tribunal.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The team, deadlines and the file that slips.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
A fair adjustment and signing the minute.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 28% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- match tax data
- raise assessments
- request papers
- visit taxpayers
- adjust tax
- objections
- tax tribunal
- tax inspection
Sources for this job· O*NET 13-2081.00· ESCO/ISCO 3352
IS WORK OVER?
Site engineer
19%
#598 / 743
View rankingSite engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Setting-out, axes and the level.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Rebar, cover and the one that is missing.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 8% | +1.8 |
Concrete, the slump and not pouring if it fails.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Note, the diary and not dressing the delay.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The site manager, the rush and not covering bad steel.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
That the column is there, and not covering the steel.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 19% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- setting-out
- axes
- rebar
- cover
- slump
- site diary
- levels
- not cover steel
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2051.00· ESCO/ISCO 2142