Automation index
How much of a Teaching assistant’s job can AI already do?
A worksheet and a support note come earlier. Sitting with the one who is stuck does not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Teaching assistant
20%
AI can already do 20% of this job.
#456 / 653
View rankingTeaching assistant
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Prepare materials and adaptations.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Support in class, playground and dining hall.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 10% | +2.2 |
Accompany SEN and small mediation.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Notes to the teacher and incident log.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Stock, copies and classroom order.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 16% | +2.6 |
Not labelling and not leaving a child alone.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 14% | +2 |
| Total | 100% | 20% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- design interfaces
- prototypes
- figma
- Prepare materials and adaptations
- Accompany SEN and small mediation
- Notes to the teacher and incident log
- Stock, copies and classroom order
- auxiliar docente
- teaching assistant
Sources for this job· O*NET 25-9042.00· ESCO/ISCO 5312
IS WORK OVER?
Dosimetrist
22%
#338 / 653
View rankingDosimetrist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
CT, contours and the plan.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Organ at risk, the curve and not overshooting.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Physics, the check and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Fraction, the setup and the patient who is not the same.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The oncologist, the trade-off and not signing blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
The tumour gets it, and the healthy organ does not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- dose plans
- contours
- organs at risk
- dosimetry check
- fractions
- setup
- sim CT
- DVH curves
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-2036.00· ESCO/ISCO 3211