Automation index
How much of a Telemarketer’s job can AI already do?
A script comes earlier. Them not hanging up in ten seconds, and not lying, do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Telemarketer
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#188 / 623
View rankingTelemarketer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Script, queue and the shift.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
The call, the no and the one who insults.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Data, GDPR and not pushing extra.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Target, the bonus and not dressing contacts.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The supervisor, quality and not skipping the no.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That they do not hang up, and not lying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- scripts
- call queues
- GDPR
- targets
- call quality
- shifts
- contacts
- the no
Sources for this job· O*NET 41-9041.00· ESCO/ISCO 4222
IS WORK OVER?
Cartographer
31%
#31 / 623
View rankingCartographer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Sources, OSM, satellite and generalisation.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Symbology, type and visual hierarchy.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 48% | +7.7 |
Projections, scales and getting the heights right.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Review with the client, the field and the lie in the data.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Print maps, web maps and updates.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Credit, metadata and owning the map.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 31% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- make maps
- generalise cartography
- symbology
- choose projection
- visual hierarchy
- update OSM
- web maps
- maps that do not lie
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-1021.00· ESCO/ISCO 2165