Automation index
How much of a Telemarketer’s job can AI already do?
A script comes earlier. Them not hanging up in ten seconds, and not lying, do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Telemarketer
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#193 / 643
View rankingTelemarketer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Script, queue and the shift.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
The call, the no and the one who insults.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Data, GDPR and not pushing extra.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Target, the bonus and not dressing contacts.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The supervisor, quality and not skipping the no.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That they do not hang up, and not lying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- scripts
- call queues
- GDPR
- targets
- call quality
- shifts
- contacts
- the no
Sources for this job· O*NET 41-9041.00· ESCO/ISCO 4222
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 643
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131