Automation index
How much of a Telemarketer’s job can AI already do?
A script comes earlier. Them not hanging up in ten seconds, and not lying, do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Telemarketer
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#193 / 643
View rankingTelemarketer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Script, queue and the shift.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
The call, the no and the one who insults.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Data, GDPR and not pushing extra.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Target, the bonus and not dressing contacts.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The supervisor, quality and not skipping the no.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That they do not hang up, and not lying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- scripts
- call queues
- GDPR
- targets
- call quality
- shifts
- contacts
- the no
Sources for this job· O*NET 41-9041.00· ESCO/ISCO 4222
IS WORK OVER?
Dosimetrist
22%
#336 / 643
View rankingDosimetrist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
CT, contours and the plan.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Organ at risk, the curve and not overshooting.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Physics, the check and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Fraction, the setup and the patient who is not the same.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The oncologist, the trade-off and not signing blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
The tumour gets it, and the healthy organ does not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- dose plans
- contours
- organs at risk
- dosimetry check
- fractions
- setup
- sim CT
- DVH curves
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-2036.00· ESCO/ISCO 3211