Automation index
How much of a Telemarketer’s job can AI already do?
A script comes earlier. Them not hanging up in ten seconds, and not lying, do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Telemarketer
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#188 / 633
View rankingTelemarketer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Script, queue and the shift.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
The call, the no and the one who insults.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Data, GDPR and not pushing extra.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Target, the bonus and not dressing contacts.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The supervisor, quality and not skipping the no.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That they do not hang up, and not lying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- scripts
- call queues
- GDPR
- targets
- call quality
- shifts
- contacts
- the no
Sources for this job· O*NET 41-9041.00· ESCO/ISCO 4222
IS WORK OVER?
Research scientist
27%
#139 / 633
View rankingResearch scientist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Literature review, figures and drafts.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 48% | +10.6 |
Analysis, code and experiment boards.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 42% | +7.6 |
Design the study and the controls.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Run the experiment or the fieldwork.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
Lead a group, theses and authorship fights.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 15% | +2.1 |
Win funding and answer reviewers.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 16% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- Literature review, figures and drafts
- Analysis, code and experiment boards
- Design the study and the controls
- Run the experiment or the fieldwork
- Lead a group, theses and authorship fights
- Win funding and answer reviewers
- cientifico
- investigador
- research scientist
Sources for this job· O*NET 19-1029.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131