Automation index
How much of a Telephony technician’s job can AI already do?
A pair and a test come earlier. Leaving a line in the flat that you can hear do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Telephony technician
22%
AI can already do 22% of this job.
#404 / 643
View rankingTelephony technician
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Pair, exchange and the line test.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Frame, drop and the wet joint.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Router, voice and the customer who cannot hear.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Lobby, the porter and the wrong cable.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The mass fault and who goes first.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
That you can hear, and not leaving the joint open.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- phone pairs
- line test
- joints
- voice drops
- frames
- routers
- mass faults
- the exchange
Sources for this job· O*NET 49-2022.00· ESCO/ISCO 7422
IS WORK OVER?
Epidemiologist
31%
#34 / 643
View rankingEpidemiologist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Surveillance, rates and the outbreak on the map.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Studies, bias and the report for public health.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 48% | +7.7 |
Surveys, contacts and the case interview.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Committee, the unpopular measure and the press.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Field, the care-home outbreak and dirty data.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Judgement, uncertainty and signing the alert.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 31% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- watch outbreaks
- compute rates
- epi studies
- case interviews
- map epidemics
- public-health measures
- contact tracing
- health alerts
Sources for this job· O*NET 19-1041.00· ESCO/ISCO 2263