Automation index
How much of a Tender specialist’s job can AI already do?
A specification comes earlier. Filing on time without leaving an empty envelope do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Tender specialist
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#187 / 643
View rankingTender specialist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Spec, requirements and the calendar.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Bid, scoring and the certificate that is late.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Board, clarifications and not contradicting.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Appeal, the tie and the one that falls.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Sales, the price and not dumping the margin.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
On time, and the envelope complete.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- specs
- scoring
- award boards
- certificates
- appeals
- tender calendar
- clarifications
- envelopes
Sources for this job· O*NET 13-1199.00· ESCO/ISCO 2422
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 643
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131