Automation index
How much of a Tender specialist’s job can AI already do?
A specification comes earlier. Filing on time without leaving an empty envelope do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Tender specialist
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#182 / 623
View rankingTender specialist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Spec, requirements and the calendar.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Bid, scoring and the certificate that is late.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Board, clarifications and not contradicting.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Appeal, the tie and the one that falls.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Sales, the price and not dumping the margin.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
On time, and the envelope complete.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- specs
- scoring
- award boards
- certificates
- appeals
- tender calendar
- clarifications
- envelopes
Sources for this job· O*NET 13-1199.00· ESCO/ISCO 2422
IS WORK OVER?
Hydraulic engineer
27%
#164 / 623
View rankingHydraulic engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Hydrology, flows and the floodplain model.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Field, section and what LiDAR misses.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Drainage works, pumps and the outfall.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Water permits and the river authority.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The flood, the village and the yes to the channel.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it does not flood, and not trusting the model alone.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- model floodplains
- flows
- drainage
- channel works
- water permits
- pumps
- channel sections
- river authority
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2051.00· ESCO/ISCO 2142